A very inconvenient bug for Array.ForEach

By -

Today I was trying to debug a user control and kept hitting an error being thrown on this line in the debugger:


          Controls.Add(cell = new HtmlGenericControl("span"));

 

To make it more confusing the message was:

Exception Details: System.ArgumentNullException: Value cannot be null.
Parameter name: array

 

So now I have a double confusion – a statement that should never throw an error that complains about an ARRAY!!!!  

 

Finally, I got frustrated and just let the page error out when I noticed that the error shown on the page was at a different location:

 

Line 36: Array.ForEach(GetEmailAddresses(), item =>

Line 37: {

Line 38: sb.Append("<br/>");

 

In other words, the interactive debugger was pointing to the wrong line!  I am very interested to see if this problem will occur in RTM of VS2010. Be warned if you are using Array.ForEach!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Simple WP7 Mango App for Background Tasks, Toast, and Tiles: Code Explanation

By -
Image
This is a continuation of this post , explaining how the sample app works. Caution : This sample isn’t meant as an example of best patterns and practices. If you see something in the code you would never do, then don’t. Solution File Organization The app has three Visual Studio Projects: the app, the agent, and the shared code library between them. One of the great things about Mango is that now the built-in Visual Studio Unit test functionality is available. By separating out the meat of the work into the SampleShared project, I can also focus my unit testing there. SampleApp1 The app has a MainPage, a ViewModel, and the WMAppManifest.xml file modified to note my ExtendedTask of BackgroundServiceAgent. The Agent is extremely simple with a call to the shared library, an update to the Tile, and a call to pop up Toast. The meat of the work is in the SampleShared library. The AgentMgr manages the background agent : add, remove, find, run now. It is only called f...
Read more

Error : /ScriptResource.axd : Invalid viewstate.

By -
This issue is caused when the ScriptResource.axd querystring parameters can not be decoded on the server. This error can be caused from multiple issues with server configuration or the Browser's interaction with the server. The ScriptResource.axd contains all of the clientside javascript routines for Ajax. Just because you include a scriptmanager that loads a script file it will never appear as a ScriptResource.AXD - instead it will be merely passed as the .js file you send if you reference a external script file. In other words it is what the Microsoft Ajax libraries inject into your HTML to allow them to access their javascript functions they need for page manipulation. ASP.NET will use the machine key to encrypt the ScriptResource.axd (and webresource.axd) url's parameters(in querystring), and by default the machinekey is a randomly generated one which may involve the current time. By default there is a different machinekey on every machine, and it changes when the applic...
Read more

Yet once more into the breech (of altered programming logic)

By -
Once upon a time, long long ago, I wrote 8-bit programs in Tiny-C with absolute addressing being the only reality.  Then we had Borland Turbo-C with relative addresses and the joys of relative assembly jumps. Enter Windows and the joys of locking and unlocking memory blocks that you must allocated and manage yourself. Then came Visual Basic which evolved into .Net CLR and decreasing awareness of what is happening under the hood.   With VS2010 including F# and enhanced parallelism in .Net4, we actually have to go retro a bit – back to the world of having to understand the hardware. CPU speeds are no longer increasing – I have an old laptop from six+ years ago that ran at 3.2 GHz. This year I updated one of my machines off-the-shelf from Costco.com, an I7-920 with 4 cores and hyper-threading (8 CPUs appears in Task Manager) and 12 GB of DDR3 RAM. This week I ordered from Costco a Phenom II X6 (Yes – 6 REAL CORES) for one of my daughters.  This CPU will (according to Yo...
Read more